1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 259 F.Supp.
  5. 259 F.Supp. 922 (1966)
 

IN RE NATTA

Misc. No. 35.

259 F.Supp. 922 (1966)

In re NATTA et al., Movant. HOGAN et al. v. ZLETZ v. BAXTER et al. v. NATTA et al.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

Supplemental Opinion October 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, Del., for senior party, Natta and others.

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., for junior party, Baxter and others.

OPINION

LAYTON, District Judge.

The question for decision here is whether or not a party to a patent interference case in the process of trial before a patent examiner may have the benefit of discovery proceedings in a United States District Court under the provisions of Rule 34 F.R.C.P.

There are four parties to this interference proceeding. In order of their assigned seniority, they are Natta et al., assignor to Montecatini Societá Generale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases