1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 48 N.J.
  5. 48 N.J. 69 (1966)
 

CAPUTZAL v. LINDSAY CO.

48 N.J. 69 (1966)

222 A.2d 513

LOUIS CAPUTZAL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE LINDSAY COMPANY, A BODY CORPORATE AND/OR UNION TANK CAR COMPANY, A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John W. Taylor argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, Jr. argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, attorney; Mr. Shebell, Jr., on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.

This is a products liability case in which the Law Division granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Appellate Division reversed in an unreported opinion and we granted certification on the defendants' petition. 46 N.J. 312 (1966).

The claim is a bizarre one. The evidence before the trial court on the motion derived from plaintiff's own testimony in a deposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases