1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 242 Cal.App.2d
  5. 242 Cal.App.2d Supp. 905 (1966)
 

PEOPLE v. CAMPISE

Docket No. 8938.

242 Cal.App.2d Supp. 905 (1966)

51 Cal. Rptr. 815

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VINCENT NATHAN CAMPISE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Diego.

May 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Langford, Langford & Lane and J. Perry Langford for Defendant and Appellant.

Edward T. Butler, City Attorney and James D. Allen, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

James Don Keller, District Attorney (San Diego), and Richard H. Bein, Deputy District Attorney, as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

Before Glen, P.J., Toothaker, J., and Conyers, J.

THE COURT.

Defendant was found guilty after a trial by the court on a charge of knowingly exhibiting obscene motion pictures in violation of Penal Code, section 311.2.

Defendant appeals on the grounds that the films in evidence were first exposed to police officers during a wrongful search; that the films were, in any event, illegally seized by the officers, without any warrant, and without any prior judicial determination of obscenity; that the evidence did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases