1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 255 F.Supp.
  5. 255 F.Supp. 888 (1966)
 

UNITED STATES v. NAPLES

Crim. No. 91-59.

255 F.Supp. 888 (1966)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. John A. NAPLES, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

June 24, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Owen, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Harold Ungar, Joseph Sitnick, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

The defendant, John A. Naples, has moved for judgment of acquittal or in the alternative for a new trial on three principal grounds. First he asserts that a confession admitted into evidence was illegally obtained. Second he asserts that the confession was involuntary and that it therefore should have been excluded as a matter of law. Finally he urges that the evidence of his insanity was so overwhelming that reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases