1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 358 F.2d
  5. 358 F.2d 777 (1966)
 

EASTLAND CONSTRUCTION CO. v. KEASBEY AND MATTISON CO.

No. 20094.

358 F.2d 777 (1966)

EASTLAND CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., Appellant, v. KEASBEY AND MATTISON COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Alioto, Maxwell M. Blecher, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Henry T. Reath, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., Bradley M. Walls, Austin, Burns, Appell & Smith, New York City, Christopher M. Jenks, Robert A. Keller, III, Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

On June 1, 1962, an indictment was returned in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania charging the Keasbey and Mattison Company and the Johns-Manville Corporation with restraining and monopolizing commerce in asbestos-cement pipe in violation of the Sherman Act.1 On the same day, Keasbey sold its asbestos-cement pipe business, including a plant located within the Northern District of California, and has done no business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases