1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. Super. 18 (1966)
 

HIGGINBOTHAM v. HIGGINBOTHAM

92 N.J. Super. 18 (1966)

222 A.2d 120

SARAH E. HIGGINBOTHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD HUGHES HIGGINBOTHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 20, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John G. Dluhy argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Mervyn R. Montgomery, on the brief).

Mr. Herbert A. Vogel argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lieblich & Cole, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

The Chancery Division judge refused to enforce the provision of a valid Florida divorce decree directing that defendant convey to plaintiff, as lump sum alimony, his interest in certain Clifton, N.J., real estate, and this on the authority of Bullock v. Bullock, 52 N.J. Eq. 561 (E. & A. 1894), affirming 51 N.J. Eq. 444 (Ch. 1893), as well as Fall v. Eastin, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases