RAO v. NOFERI


50 Misc.2d 60 (1966)

Paul P. Rao, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Luigi Noferi et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

March 24, 1966


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Elliott Silfen for appellants. No appearance for respondents.

TILZER, J. P., HOFSTADTER and GOLD, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

An attorney has the implied authority to incur and is entitled to be reimbursed for such reasonable expenditures as the diligent prosecution or defense of the lawsuit may require (Badger v. Celler, 41 App. Div. 599; Regis Radio Corp. v. American Employers Ins. Co., 30 Misc.2d 341; Matter of Lessig, 165 Misc. 706). However, such disbursements are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases