Defendant was found guilty by separate jury verdicts of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245) and mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203). Based upon the rule against multiple punishment (Pen. Code, § 654) for "one indivisible transaction" (Neal v. State of California,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. VIGIL
Docket No. 5045.
242 Cal.App.2d 862 (1966)
51 Cal. Rptr. 860
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERNEST VIGIL, Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 20, 1966.
June 20, 1966.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Howard Jameson, under appointment by the District Court of Appeal, and Condon, Dolgin & Kully for Defendant and Appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Edward P. O'Brien and Jay S. Linderman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
