1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 255 F.Supp.
  5. 255 F.Supp. 847 (1966)
 

SCHULMAN v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 66 Civ. 130.

255 F.Supp. 847 (1966)

Emilie SCHULMAN, Hosiery by Emilie, Inc., and Harem Hosiery, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

House, Grossman, Vorhaus & Hemley, New York City, for plaintiffs; Sidney Greenman, Neal H. Pilson, of counsel.

Gainsburg, Gottlieb, Levitan & Cole, New York City, for defendants Burlington Industries, Inc., Herbert M. Kaiser and Howard A. Kaiser and Lawrence Greenwald; Stephen A. Lefkowitz, New York City, of counsel.

J. Leon Israel, New York City, for defendants Parklane Hosiery Inc., and Herbert Somekh.

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, who own and operate in Chicago stores selling women's hosiery at retail, have filed a four-count complaint against (1) Burlington Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of women's hosiery, among other products, (2) Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc., which is both a wholesale distributor and an operator of retail stores selling women's hosiery, and (3) several officers and employees of these defendant corporations.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases