IN RE HINMAN

Docket No. 11638.

239 Cal.App.2d 845 (1966)

49 Cal. Rptr. 162

In re CHARLES W. HINMAN on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 2, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caryl Warner for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Murray M. Chotiner and George Magit for Real Party in Interest.


FRAMPTON, J. pro tem.*

Habeas corpus to review a judgment of imprisonment for contempt.

We will confine this opinion to matters relating to Count III of the order to show cause for the reasons hereinafter stated.

The petitioner's principal point in attacking the validity of the judgment, as it relates to Count III, is that he was charged in a single count with three possible contempts and that by reason thereof he was unable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases