OPPENHEIMER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 18639.

363 F.2d 708 (1966)

Beatrice W. OPPENHEIMER, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 17, 1966.

Petition for Rehearing Denied August 17, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gilbert Hahn, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Mr. Henry E. Wixon, Asst. Corporation Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Milton D. Korman, Acting Corporation Counsel, and Donald T. Fish, Asst. Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for respondent.

Before DANAHER, WRIGHT and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges.


Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied August 17, 1966.

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge.

There are a number of anomalies inherent in residence in the District of Columbia, but none is more striking than that of being simultaneously subjected to differing schemes of income taxation devised by the same legislature. The resulting confusion plagues taxpayer, tax collector, and court alike. This review of a decision of the District of Columbia Tax Court does not lessen the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases