1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 363 F.2d
  5. 363 F.2d 702 (1966)
 

INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED A., A. & A. IMP. WKRS. v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 19616, 19636.

363 F.2d 702 (1966)

INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Aero Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AERO CORPORATION, Respondent, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 15, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. John Silard, Stephen I. Schlossberg and Mrs. Harriett R. Taylor, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19616 and intervenor in No. 19636.

Mr. Jules H. Gordon, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Gary Green, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in No. 19616 and petitioner in No. 19636. Mr. Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, also entered an appearance for respondent in No. 19616 and petitioner in No. 19636.

Mr. James P. Swann, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom Messrs. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., and John E. Branch, Atlanta, Ga., were on the brief, for intervenor in No. 19616 and respondent in No. 19636.

Before DANAHER, WRIGHT and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated cases are here on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against Aero Corporation (Company), and on the petition of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers (Union) to review a portion of the order.

The Board, in agreement with the Trial Examiner, found that the Company had violated Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases