DAVID v. LOSE

No. 39923.

7 Ohio St. 2d 97 (1966)

DAVID, APPELLANT, v. LOSE ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 6, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W. V. Weiford, for appellant.

Mr. Russell J. Burt and Mr. Mervyn T. Grosjean, for appellees.


HERBERT, J.

When the plaintiff entrusted his mare to the defendants for breeding purposes and paid for this service, a bailment for hire was created. See 7 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d, Bailments, Sections 3 and 6. The bailee for hire is obligated by law to exercise ordinary care in the safekeeping of the bailor's property, e. g., Hotels Statler Co., Inc., v. Safier (1921), 103 Ohio St. 638. The bailee also promises to return the property undamaged upon the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases