MITCHELL v. UNITED BUCKINGHAM FREIGHT LINES

No. 38172.

69 Wn.2d 974 (1966)

419 P.2d 318

JAMES J. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. UNITED BUCKINGHAM FREIGHT LINES et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

October 20, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benn Agor, for appellant.

Kahin, Horswill, Keller, Rohrback, Waldo & Moren, for respondents.


PER CURIAM:

The sole question presented by plaintiff's four assignments of error is the court's refusal to give plaintiff's requested instruction that defendants were chargeable with negligence as a matter of law for their alleged violation of a city ordinance.

We find no merit in the assignments. The jury was correctly instructed; the requested instruction does not state the law.

Instruction No. 7 instructed the jury as to the applicable portion of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases