HATTEN v. BATTERBERRY

No. 38229.

69 Wn.2d 972 (1966)

418 P.2d 236

PETER HATTEN, Appellant, v. JANIE BATTERBERRY et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

September 15, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moschetto & Alfieri and K.R. St. Clair, for appellant.

Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester and George W. Wilkins, for respondents.


PER CURIAM:

This is an action by a pedestrian to recover damages for injuries sustained from an automobile striking him while he was in an unmarked crosswalk. The jury returned a verdict for defendants.

The appellant has assigned error to the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on the last clear chance doctrine. He argued the evidence and circumstances were such that the jury was entitled to disbelieve the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases