This is an appeal from a judgment granting a permanent injunction. Plaintiff, defendant in error herein, sought an injunction prohibiting defendants, plaintiffs in error herein, from building or attempting to build a fence "* * * approximately 12 feet east of the west side of the 31 foot alley which has been maintained for many years by the City of Hominy, immediately west of
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZIMMERMAN v. NEWPORT
No. 40935.
416 P.2d 622 (1966)
L.W. ZIMMERMAN and Bessie Zimmerman, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Cal NEWPORT, Defendant in Error.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 1, 1966.
Rehearing Denied May 31, 1966.
Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied July 26, 1966.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frank T. McCoy, Robert P. Kelly, Bruce W. Gambill, Pawhuska, for plaintiffs in error.
T.F. Dukes, Hominy, Hamilton, Kane & Kane, Pawhuska, for defendant in error.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
