1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 770 (1966)
 

N. L. R. B. v. HARVEY

Civ. No. 64-C-12-L.

264 F.Supp. 770 (1966)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Applicant, v. E. Bruce HARVEY, Respondent.

United States District Court W. D. Virginia, at Lynchburg.

February 15, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George B. Driesen, Washington, D. C., and Edwin J. Gutman, Baltimore, Md., Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for NLRB.

S. Bolling Hobbs, Lynchburg, Va. (Caskie, Frost, Davidson & Hobbs, Lynchburg, Va., on the brief), for E. Bruce Harvey, respondent.

BARKSDALE, District Judge.

Pursuant to the mandate of the Court of Appeals on the remand of this case to this court, N. L. R. B. v. Harvey, 4 Cir., 349 F.2d 900, a full evidentiary hearing was held on February 9, 1966, to enable this court to determine whether or not an attorney-client relationship existed which justified the refusal of respondent, E. Bruce Harvey, to obey the subpoena duces tecum heretofore issued and served on him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases