1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 355 F.2d
  5. 355 F.2d 662 (1966)
 

MENEFIELD v. UNITED STATES

No. 20213.

355 F.2d 662 (1966)

Edward Worth MENEFIELD and Mary Thompson, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward I. Gritz, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., John K. Van de Kamp, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Crim. Div.; J. Brin Schulman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Asst. Chief, Crim. Div.; Jules D. Barnett, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

From our examination of the record, we cannot overturn as clearly erroneous the finding of the trial court that consent to a search which turned up important real evidence was freely given. Appellants attack the evidence obtained and assert that it was the fruit of an illegal arrest. This is only important if the consent was not freely given. Davis v. State of California, 9 Cir., 341 F.2d 982<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases