1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 150 S.E.2d
  5. 150 S.E.2d 863 (1966)
 

STATE v. DAY

No. 496.

150 S.E.2d 863 (1966)

268 N.C. 464

STATE v. Edward Bernard DAY, Eugene Davis, Joseph William Freelow, and Lewis Stanley.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton, Deputy Atty. Gen. Harry W. McGalliard and Staff Atty. Ralph A. White, Jr., for the State.

Plumides & Plumides, John G. Plumides, and Jerry W. Whitley, Charlotte, for defendant appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Each of the assignments of error brought forward in defendants' brief has been carefully considered. Defendants' contention in respect of each assignment is fully considered and answered in the Attorney General's brief. Suffice to say, none of the assignments discloses prejudicial error or presents a question of sufficient merit to require or warrant discussion. The jury, on uncontradicted evidence, found the alleged (serious and despicable) crime was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases