ROTHSCHILD v. WORLD-WIDE AUTOS. CORP.


18 N.Y.2d 982 (1966)

Sidney M. Rothschild et al., Appellants, v. World-Wide Automobiles Corporation et al., Defendants, and Samuel C. Dretzin, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 30, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Rosen for appellants.

Jay Leo Rothschild for respondent.

Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI and BERGAN concur in Memorandum; Judge BURKE dissents in an opinion in which Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge KEATING concur.


MEMORANDUM.

Order granting summary judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs to defendant-respondent. Plaintiffs do not establish in support of their complaint and in opposition to the motion for summary judgment that they had a contract which could form a basis for a cause of action against defendant-respondent for interference; nor do they in any event show facts which would impute a personal liability to defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases