1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 237 Cal.App.2d
  5. 237 Cal.App.2d 760 (1965)
 

BEAUREGARD v. WINGARD

Docket No. 7445.

237 Cal.App.2d 760 (1965)

47 Cal. Rptr. 279

MAURICE EMILE BEAUREGARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM H. WINGARD et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District.

October 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Schwartz and Edward L. Lascher for Plaintiff and Appellant.

McInnis, Focht & Fitzgerald and James L. Focht for Defendants and Respondents.

STONE, J.*

[1] This being an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a motion for nonsuit, not only must we view the evidence in the light most favorable to appellant, but we must also indulge every reasonable inference and every reasonable intendment in his favor in determining whether there is substantial evidence that would support a verdict in appellant's favor. (Meyer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases