1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 237 Cal.App.2d
  5. 237 Cal.App.2d 753 (1965)
 

KRAMER v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 29729.

237 Cal.App.2d 753 (1965)

47 Cal. Rptr. 317

WILLIAM M. KRAMER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; IRVING BRISKIN, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

October 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gang, Tyre, Rudin & Brown, Jane Rogers and Martin Gang for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Savitch, Benjamin E. King and Robert H. Thau for Real Party in Interest.

KATZ, J. pro tem.*

This is a petition for writ of mandate requiring respondent court to vacate an order denying petitioner's motion to compel real party in interest to answer questions on deposition. The question presented is whether a litigant who seeks a court order compelling a witness to answer relevant and nonprivileged questions at the taking of his deposition must show "good cause" therefor within the meaning of section 2036, subdivision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases