James W. WITTY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RIALROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and
System Federation No. 91 of the Railway Employes' Department, AFL-CIO, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 2, 1965.
March 2, 1965.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Alan S. Rosenthal, Richard S. Salzman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Richard P. Stein, U. S. Atty., Indianapolis, Ind., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
William T. Fitzgerald, Evansville, Ind., H. G. Breetz, M. D. Jones, Louisville, Ky., for defendant-appellee.
Richard R. Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, for intervening defendant-appellee, Mulholland, Hickey & Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, McCray, Clark, Statham & McCray, William E. Statham, Herman L. McCray, Evansville, Ind., of counsel.
Before CASTLE, KILEY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
KILEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Witty, a reemployed veteran, sued under Sec. 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act,1 claiming restoration of job seniority rights. After allowing System Federation No. 91 of the Railway Employes' Department, AFL-CIO, bargaining representative for Witty's Union — Brotherhood of Railroad Carmen — to intervene as a defendant, the court granted summary judgment against Witty, and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
