HOLLAND PAVING CO. v. DANN

No. 34096.

175 So.2d 780 (1965)

HOLLAND PAVING CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. James A. DANN, Individually, and James A. Dann as the Administrator of the Estate of James Arthur Dann, Jr., Deceased, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Stanley Levine and Fred Patrox, Miami, for petitioner.

Wesley A. Fink, Daytona Beach, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases