Per Curiam.
Her testimony was merely that defendant "touched" her once, but where was shown, in the language of the trial transcript, by "indicating"; and since the record does not disclose nor even suggest the part of her body so indicated, the confession stood alone and her testimony did not constitute the "additional proof that the crime charged [had] been committed", which is prerequisite to conviction. (Code Crim. Pro., § 395; People v. Belcher...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
