Per Curiam.
Claimant asserts "good cause" in that (1) she was paid less than the prevailing wage rate and (2) the employer increased her duties beyond those agreed upon at the time of her hiring; but, when interviewed by the local unemployment insurance office, she first described the work that she actually performed and then said, "I knew what I was supposed to do when I accepted the job. I was told my salary when I was interviewed for the job. I left because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
