NAT. AUTOMATION v. REINSURANCE CORP.


47 Misc.2d 893 (1965)

National Automation Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Reinsurance Corp. of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

June 8, 1965


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis N. Forman for plaintiff. Hart, Hume & Engelman for defendants.


SAMUEL H. HOFSTADTER, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. In its opposing affidavits, in addition to controverting plaintiff's statements of fact, defendants seek to have the complaint dismissed (CPLR 3212, subd. [b]) on the ground that this court does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action. Defendant also argues that the complaint is insufficient on its face for failure to allege that a claimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases