YATES v. BAIR TRANSPORT, INC.


249 F.Supp. 681 (1965)

Andrew YATES, Plaintiff, v. BAIR TRANSPORT, INC., Knickerbocker Despatch, Inc. and Samuel Benrubi, individually and d/b/a Jay Bee Co., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 2, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emile Z. Berman and A. Harold Frost, New York City, for plaintiff, Marvin V. Ausubel, New York City, of counsel.

Alexander, Ash & Schwartz, New York City, for defendant BAIR Transport, Inc., Sidney Schwartz, New York City, of counsel.

Perrell, Nielsen & Stephens, New York City, for defendant Knickerbocker Despatch, Inc., John W. Fuhrman, New York City, of counsel.


TENNEY, District Judge.

The respective parties herein request of the Court a ruling prior to trial on the admissibility of two proffered items of evidence: firstly, a police blotter report concerning the instant accident, and, secondly, medical reports of various doctors who examined plaintiff in connection with a prior Workmen's Compensation claim arising out of the accident.

The parties have stipulated that if the reporting officer were called he would testify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases