HERNANDEZ v. KONINKLIJKE NEDERLANDSCHE STOOMBOOT MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V.

64 Ad. 511.

259 F.Supp. 658 (1965)

Oscar HERNANDEZ, Libellant, v. KONINKLIJKE NEDERLANDSCHE STOOMBOOT MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V., and S.S. HECUBA, her engines, boilers, etc., Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

November 23, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Poles Tublin & Patestides, New York City, for libellant.

Burlingham, Underwood, Barron, Wright & White, New York City, for respondent.


CANNELLA, District Judge.

Motion for reargument by the libellant, pursuant to Rule 9(m) of the General Rules for the Southern District of New York, is granted. The court has examined the grounds asserted by the movant to have been allegedly overlooked by the court in reaching its determination, but finds them without merit. The court adheres to its original decision. However, an issue as to the damage limitation contained in the contract of carriage between the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases