Judgment affirmed.
The trial court found the statement or confession, to have been voluntarily signed by defendant, but held that it should have been excluded because it had been given after his arrest and prior to arraignment. In so holding the court erred. A voluntary statement, made after arrest and prior to arraignment, is now admissible despite the fact that the defendant was not advised of his right to remain silent or his right to a lawyer (People v. Gunner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
