Judgment reversed on the law and on the facts and a new trial ordered.
Defendant was convicted on the testimony of the victim that the crimes were committed and upon his own admissions that he was involved in their commission to the extent that he drove the car for the two actual robbers. The testimony of the victim was sufficient corroboration of the oral admissions made by the defendant (Code Crim. Pro., § 395; People v. Taleisnik, 225 N.Y. 489; People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.