Order affirmed.
In this proceeding defendant challenges the judgment on the ground that he was not represented by counsel at the time he was arraigned on the indictments and entered a plea of not guilty thereto. Thereafter he was assigned counsel, who represented him throughout the rest of the proceedings. There is no factual showing of prejudice. These circumstances do not constitute a deprivation of defendant's constitutional right to counsel (People v. Tyson...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.