1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 140 S.E.2d
  5. 140 S.E.2d 767 (1965)
 

STATE v. MORROW

No. 249.

140 S.E.2d 767 (1965)

264 N.C. 77

STATE v. Charles E. MORROW.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen., T. W. Bruton, and Deputy Atty. Gen., Harry W. McGalliard, for the State.

George J. Miller, Charlotte, for defendant appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The evidence offered by defendant in support of his motion was insufficient to establish the prerequisites for granting a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence stated by Stacy, C. J., in the oft-cited case of State v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81. Moreover, a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Williams, 244 N.C. 459

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases