1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 374 Mich.
  5. 374 Mich. 514 (1965)
 

SMITH, H. & G. ASSOC., INC. v. RIVER ROUGE BUILDING AUTH.

Calendar No. 15, Docket No. 50,203.

374 Mich. 514 (1965)

132 N.W.2d 682

SMITH, HINCHMAN & GRYLLS ASSOCIATES, INC., v. RIVER ROUGE BUILDING AUTHORITY.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beaumont, Smith & Harris (Alfred E. Lindbloom, of counsel) for plaintiff.

Thomas Roy Finn, for defendant city.

DETHMERS, J.

Plaintiff is a firm of architects. It sued the 2 defendants for $32,866.14, the amount it claims due on contract for services rendered. A default judgment was entered against defendant building authority. After trial a judgment of no cause for action was entered in favor of defendant city. Plaintiff appeals.

The city had desired to build a civic center and new city hall. Acting under the provisions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases