1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 354 F.2d
  5. 354 F.2d 533 (1965)
 

KING-SEELEY THERMOS CO. v. REFRIGERATED DISPENSERS, INC.

No. 8016.

354 F.2d 533 (1965)

KING-SEELEY THERMOS CO., Appellant, v. REFRIGERATED DISPENSERS, INC., Diamond Ice Machine Company, and the Diamond Corporation, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

December 27, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don K. Harness, of Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich. (Crowe, Boxley, Dunlevy, Thweatt, Swinford & Johnson, Oklahoma City, Okl., and Cyrus G. Minkler, Detroit, Mich., with him on the brief), for appellant.

Morris Spector, Chicago, Ill. (Head & Johnson and Paul H. Johnson, Tulsa, Okl., with him on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, King-Seeley Thermos Company, is a Michigan corporation and the owner of U.S. Letters Patent Nos. 2,753,694, (694), and 3,034,311, (311), relating to machines for making flaked ice.1 It brought this action alleging that the appellees were committing acts of infringement upon the aforesaid patents. By answer, the appellees denied infringement and alleged invalidity of the patents in suit on various...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases