BORELLO v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


26 Wis.2d 62 (1965)

BORELLO, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 5, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Roland J. Steinle, Jr., of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Gordon Samuelsen, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was George Thompson, attorney general.


BEILFUSS, J.

It is the appellant's contention that the commission does not lack jurisdiction to reconsider her claim because extrinsic fraud on the part of the employer, Marathon, prevented the commission from determining the real issue, namely, did the claimant suffer an occupational disease (lead poisoning) caused by her employment.

Counsel for the appellant candidly states in his brief:

"At the beginning of this argument it must be said that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases