HURST v. STOWERS

No. 40721.

399 P.2d 477 (1965)

Lela HURST and Floyd Hurst, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Amos STOWERS, Lloyd Holt, Buddy Stowers and B.D. Stowers, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

February 9, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph O. Minter, Madill, and Welch & Dudley, Madill, by Edwin W. Dudley, for plaintiffs in error.

Wallace & Bickford, by Wilson Wallace, Ardmore, for defendants in error.


WILLIAMS, Justice.

The question to be determined in this appeal is whether the road here involved has been traveled continuously by the public adversely to the record landowner for at least the prescriptive period so as to constitute it a public road.

The action from which this appeal arises was initiated by defendants in error against plaintiffs in error. Our continued reference to the parties is as they appeared in the trial court.

In their petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases