1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 402 P.2d
  5. 402 P.2d 470 (1965)
 

BARRINGER v. GUNDERSON

Nos. 4773-4775.

402 P.2d 470 (1965)

Robert E. BARRINGER; Frances B. Hawkins, as Executrix of the Estate of L.O. Hawkins, aka Leslie O. Hawkins, aka Leslie Oliver Hawkins, Deceased; Howard W. Cannon; Mary A. Barringer and Laura Helen Root, Appellants, v. E.M. GUNDERSON, Guardian ad Litem of Carlita Ray, an Infant; Ida Angelot Ray; Tennys Mortensen, as Administratrix of the Estate of Truman Nye, Deceased; and Wayne R. Millington, Respondents. Tennys MORTENSEN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Truman Nye, Deceased; and Wayne R. Millington, Appellants, v. E.M. GUNDERSON, Guardian ad Litem of Carlita Ray, an Infant; Ida Angelot Ray; Robert E. Barringer; Frances B. Hawkins, as Executrix of the Estate of L.O. Hawkins, aka Leslie O. Hawkins, aka Leslie Oliver Hawkins, Deceased; Howard W. Cannon; Mary A. Barringer and Laura Helen Root, Respondents. E.M. GUNDERSON, Guardian ad Litem of Carlita Ray, an Infant, Appellant, v. Robert E. BARRINGER; Frances B. Hawkins, as Executrix of the Estate of L.O. Hawkins, aka Leslie O. Hawkins, aka Leslie Oliver Hawkins, Deceased; Howard W. Cannon; Mary A. Barringer; Laura Helen Root; Ida Angelot Ray; Tennys Mortensen, as Administratrix of the Estate of Truman Nye, Deceased; and Wayne R. Millington, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 18, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hawkins, Cannon & Hawkins, of Las Vegas, for Robert E. Barringer; Frances B. Hawkins, as executrix of the estate of L.O. Hawkins; Howard W. Cannon; Mary A. Barringer and Laura Helen Root.

E.M. Gunderson, of Las Vegas, for E.M. Gunderson, guardian ad litem of Carlita Ray.

Vargas, Dillon, Bartlett & Dixon, of Reno, for Ida Angelot Ray.

Myron E. Leavitt, of Las Vegas, for Tennys Mortensen and Wayne R. Millington.

BADT, Justice.

These three appeals, which, although they have some points of law in common, for the most part raise different questions of law, were for convenience consolidated for argument. They were separately and elaborately briefed and separate counsel appeared for the respective appellants, and respondents.

The history of this matter appears in the case of Gunderson v. Barringer, 76 Nev. 133, 350 P.2d 397. It appears...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases