Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Breitel, J. P., and Valente, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant new trial only on the ground that the curtailment of the cross-examination of the witness Weitz required striking of his testimony and an appropriate instruction to the jury. There are other errors in the charge but, in the light of the strong case for the People, those errors would not warrant reversal. Thus the court should have charged the jury on the significance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
