The transcript of the police blotter entry was admissible only to show that a repossession report had been made by a person asserting himself to be "Trahan" and defendant's agent. The entry was not competent to show that the person was in fact Joseph Trahan, or that he had been authorized to repossess for defendant either plaintiff's vehicle or the vehicle described in the police report (Johnson v. Lutz, 253 N.Y. 124; CPLR 4518, subd. [a]; 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
