1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 143 S.E.2d
  5. 143 S.E.2d 707 (1965)
 

MORPUL, INC. v. MAYO KNITTING MILL, INC.

No. 698.

143 S.E.2d 707 (1965)

265 N.C. 257

MORPUL, INC. v. MAYO KNITTING MILL, INC.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 27, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Rabin, McNeill Smith and Jack Floyd, Greensboro, for plaintiff appellant.

McLendon, Brim, Holderness & Brooks, by Thronton H. Brooks, Greensboro, Bridgers, Horton & Britt, by H. Vinson Bridgers; Tarboro, and B. B. Olive, Durham, for defendant appellee.

SHARP, Justice.

"Only a Federal Court has jurisdiction to consider an action involving the construction of the patent laws, the validity of a patent, or questions of infringement. (Citations.) * * * But not every case involving rights conferred by the patent laws is beyond the jurisdiction of state courts. When the action is brought on a contract, or in tort, with respect to the exercise of a patent right the state court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases