This proceeding is in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis and was decided upon the pleadings.
By a petition dated November 19, 1954, a previous application for a writ of error coram nobis was made by the petitioner upon the ground that (1) he should have been represented by counsel at the time of his arraignment, and (2) that the four sentences under the first indictment should run concurrently and not consecutively...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
