1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 353 F.2d
  5. 353 F.2d 484 (1965)
 

GOLDSTEIN v. DOFT

No. 99, Docket 29552.

353 F.2d 484 (1965)

Edward GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Max DOFT, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided November 22, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Rassner, New York City (Leonard H. Wallach, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Samuel B. Seidel, New York City (Kurzman & Frank, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on Judge Weinfeld's opinion below, reported at 236 F.Supp. 730. While Judge Weinfeld's opinion makes no specific reference to the allegations that appellant was deprived "of the fruits of his labors in introducing a new line to the shoe trade," it is clear from the context that this item was not overlooked. As with appellant's other claims on the merits, the difference between the issues litigated before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases