Order reversed, with costs in all courts, and complaint dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff's failure to shut off the power on the air conditioning machine before attempting to replace the compressor belt was so careless as to amount to contributory negligence as a matter of law (Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Amsterdam Color Works, 284 App. Div. 376, affd.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SEIDMAN v. M & R AIR CONDITIONING CORP.
15 N.Y.2d 814 (1965)
Samuel Seidman, Respondent, v. M & R Air Conditioning Corporation et al., Appellants.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted January 13, 1965.
Decided February 11, 1965.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
