1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 235 Cal.App.2d
  5. 235 Cal.App.2d 591 (1965)
 

RICH v. STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY

Docket Nos. 21797, 21961.

235 Cal.App.2d 591 (1965)

45 Cal. Rptr. 512

M.B. RICH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY et al., Defendants and Appellants. ALONZO W. OAKLEY, JR., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ARTHUR B. EMMES et al., Defendants and Appellants. (Consolidated Appeals.)

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

July 7, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Mosk and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorneys General, and Wiley W. Manuel, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Wilke, Fleury & Sapunor and Joe S. Gray as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Jefferson E. Peyser, J. Edward Fleishell and Wainwright & Fleishell for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Charles J. Katz and Louis C. Hoyt as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.

MOLINARI, J.

These two separate cases present a major common issue and will therefore be considered together. In each the State Board of Optometry and its members1 appeal from the judgment commanding the Board to issue a branch office license to petitioners therein.2

Procedural Background

All three petitioners are optometrists duly licensed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases