1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 240 Or.
  5. 240 Or. 583 (1965)
 

PULLEN v. ORE. IND. DEVELOPMENT CORP.

240 Or. 583 (1965)

402 P.2d 240

PULLEN ET AL v. OREGON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed May 26, 1965.

Petition for rehearing denied June 22, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were William E. Love, Cake, Jaureguy, Hardy, Buttler & McEwen, and Lenon & Willner, Portland

James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were William G. Dick, and Dick & Dick, The Dalles, and Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf and Edwin L. Graham, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.

REVERSED.

SLOAN, J.

This case involves a problem created by the inundation of the city of Arlington by the waters impounded by the John Day Dam. The problem concerns the plan adopted by the city government to relocate the business section of the city. We have been unable to find reference to a counterpart of this particular situation.

It appears from the record that the city council has considered various plans to provide for the relocation of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases