Appellants contend that the denial of an adjournment was an abuse of discretion and that the trial in Surrogate's Court was defective because one of the appellants, a first cousin of the testatrix once removed, was not present. In view of the previous delay in these proceedings; the order of this court on March 15, 1965, to set the case down for trial (Matter of Case,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.