1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 346 F.2d
  5. 346 F.2d 474 (1965)
 

SIEBRING v. HANSEN

No. 17814.

346 F.2d 474 (1965)

Claude SIEBRING d/b/a Siebring Manufacturing Company, and Owen Siebring, Appellants, v. Charles W. HANSEN and AFSCO, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Zarley, of Dick, Zarley, McKee & Thomte, Des Moines, Iowa, made argument for appellant and filed brief with Bruce W. McKee and Dennis L. Thomte, Des Moines, Iowa, Robert R. Eidsmoe, of Gleysteen, Nelson, Harper, Kunze & Eidsmoe, Sioux City, Iowa, and Lucas J. DeKoster, Hull, Iowa.

Phillip H. Smith, of Merchant, Merchant & Gould, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for appellees and filed brief with John D. Gould, Minneapolis, Minn.

Before MATTHES and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and REGISTER, District Judge.

MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

This is a civil contempt proceeding in which the trial court, Honorable William C. Hanson, found Claude Siebring and Owen Siebring in contempt on the ground that they had continued to infringe a patent subsequent to and in violation of a previous court decree.1 The basic question presented here is whether the court committed error in holding the Seibrings in contempt. The issue of infringement was also injected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases