1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 63 Cal.2d
  5. 63 Cal.2d 754 (1965)
 

IN RE DAUP

Docket No. Crim. 8813.

63 Cal.2d 754 (1965)

408 P.2d 957

48 Cal. Rptr. 181

In re WILLIAM J. DAUP on Habeas Corpus.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 23, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Daup, in pro. per., and Robert N. Beechinor, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Robert R. Granucci, Paul N. Halvonik and Edward P. O'Brien, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondents.

PETERS, J.

This petition involves the same issue resolved today in In re Estrada, ante, page 740 [48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948]. The problem is whether, when a law providing punishment for a criminal act is amended so as to ameliorate the punishment after the act is committed but before the judgment of conviction has become final, does the law as it read when the act was committed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases