1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 235 Cal.App.2d
  5. 235 Cal.App.2d 567 (1965)
 

PADULA v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 29444.

235 Cal.App.2d 567 (1965)

45 Cal. Rptr. 500

ELMER A. PADULA, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; BROGDEX COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

July 6, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Ernest M. Thayer for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Hackett & Hubbard and Ralph B. Hubbard for Real Party in Interest.

FRAMPTON, J, pro tem.*

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to compel the respondent court to dismiss or abate an action now pending in such court entitled "Brogdex Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Elmer A. Padula, Doe One to Doe Twenty, inclusive, Defendants, No. 849,345."

On September 27, 1963, petitioner filed an action against Brogdex in the Superior Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases